Category
21 articles
The data management plan is the contract for how trial data is collected, cleaned, and locked. Each section, its commitment, and the failure it prevents.
A risk management plan records how you identify, score, mitigate, and review risks to quality and safety. The four-step loop and a section-by-section template.
A monitoring plan turns your risk assessment into activity: who watches what, how often, by which method — and how to keep it a living, risk-tuned document.
Oversight isn’t “watching the trial” — it’s the sponsor’s duty to ensure conduct and data are reliable, and prove it. Each duty mapped to a runnable KPI.
A protocol deviation is any departure from the approved protocol. A fillable log template, the classification rubric behind each column, and the CAPA bridge.
The protocol is the operating manual for the study — why it’s run, who’s eligible, what happens, how it’s analyzed. Every section, and the rule behind it.
Read the trial master file as a narrative an inspector follows, not a cabinet to fill. The test for what belongs, and what “inspection-ready” really means.
The trial master file is the evidence a trial was run per protocol and GCP. Essential documents by phase, and the QC routine that proves the file is complete.
GxP is a family of “Good x Practice” disciplines, not one certificate you pass. The acronyms decoded, and the three software controls they all converge on.
CSV testing isn’t “run every prewritten IQ/OQ/PQ script.” A risk-based approach to what to test, how rigorously, and where vendor evidence replaces scripting.
A CSV package is a connected chain of documents following the V-model, not one “protocol.” The full deliverable set, and the matrix that ties it together.
Computer system validation is governed by a connected arc of FDA documents, not one — reading the shift from exhaustive CSV to risk-based assurance (CSA).
A native spreadsheet isn’t Part 11 compliant, for structural reasons. Why Track Changes isn’t an audit trail, and the controls a spreadsheet can’t provide.
A section-by-section Part 11 self-audit with exact subsection references, a pass/partial/fail column, and break-out checklists for the controls teams miss.
“Part 11 compliant software” is a vendor claim, not a switch you can buy. What vendors actually ship, and the configuration, validation, and SOPs you own.
E6(R3) is a structural rewrite of GCP, not a touch-up. What changed — risk-based quality management, essential records, monitoring — and what to do next.
Computer system validation is documented evidence that a system does what it’s specified to do — a risk-and-evidence discipline, not a paperwork ritual.
ICH GCP isn’t a checklist to pass an inspection — it’s an operating model. The 11 principles of E6(R3), read as how to think about a trial, not boxes to tick.
An audit trail answers who, what, when, and why for every change. A real annotated example, field by field, and what separates it from an ordinary log.
ALCOA isn’t a glossary to memorize — it’s an accountability map. For each attribute, who owns it on a trial and the data-integrity failure it prevents.
Part 11 is conditional: it bites only once a predicate rule applies. What’s actually in scope, and why “compliant software” is a claim, not a switch.
Begin on the Free plan with up to 3 users, all core features and no credit card required. Upgrade anytime.
On the next page, we'll email you a link to finish creating your account.
Please enter a valid email address.
